🔗 Share this article

Itranspired the manager could survive defeat by lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams in living memory. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, his rigid approach, laying waste to the team's best homegrown talent, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. You come at Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Unfortunately, similar to numerous top-flight defender during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, Amorim came at Jason Wilcox and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who often railed his squad for losing individual battles crumbling in the face of the white heat and formidable presence of one of England's top division's most feared football executives.

In truth, this entire bruising episode seems to paint the director in a different perspective. It may have been easy, given his nine months in a similar role at Southampton, to regard him as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: a man whose appointment was due largely to his friendship with his former boss a fellow executive rather than any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, as he outmanoeuvred the hapless Dan Ashworth earlier, he has demonstrated to be among the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s competitors will now be justifiably concerned.

The Tactical Conflict Over Formation and Philosophy

To illustrate, it was the director , after being involved in the leadership that hired the 3-4-3 fundamentalist Amorim in the first place, played a key role in attempting to convince him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Unsurprisingly, these pleas were resisted. However, these judgements carry more weight when delivered by a man with the impeccable football pedigree of Jason Wilcox, holder of three England caps and a role in a title-winning side from 31 years ago.

Perhaps in time he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning publicly. Perhaps at some point questions may arise regarding why the coach is departing with full compensation, with no compensation reduction clause in place. The director seldom speaks publicly, for excellent reasons. The real thinkers of this sport – men like Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be high-frequency signals and complex calculations. Wanting is not the same as being prepared to comprehend it.

An Ultimate Power Behind the Throne

But of course, in training our focus on the sporting director we are obscuring the true genius behind the modern United throne. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also proposed playing Bryan Mbeumo as a right wing-back. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace data science and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that the team's approach to football “will be decided by this group”.

After all, Sir Jim is a specialist in this technical footballing stuff, drawing from his previous experience in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains immensely wealthy, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, sagacious, more tactically astute, fundamentally superior. Whom else would you trust to manage a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that looks a lot like someone’s leftover knitting, the signing of a new striker?

The Modern Soccer Order: Executives Above Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, teams mistakenly entrusted major sporting choices to low-level employees like managers, scouts – even footballers. Maybe previously feasible for an up-and-coming, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals established? How many mass redundancies have they managed? Far preferable to invest the real power where it rightly belongs: the leadership tier, the open-necked shirt brigade, the guys with the jaw-dropping professional resumes. Better by far to determine the tactics in the boardroom and hire a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If coaches were formerly chefs, they have become more like Deliveroo drivers: not creating the product, but still finally accountable should it be delivered poorly or leaks out to meet standards.

In the meantime, a coach's role has become less about crafting the philosophy and more about marketing it: the front-facing representative of the operation, the visible figurehead of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic finds his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him live to blunder another day.

The Neoliberal Football: Accountability Only for the Coaches

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism in action: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain sacrosanct, whose errors can always be resolved by sacking without justification. Hire the system coach only to fire them for using excessively 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later discard him for taking too long. And most importantly be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.